Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gloria Ceschi vs Taisiia Burakova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ceschi vs Burakova analysis and find out who is favored!
Gloria Ceschi vs Taisiia Burakova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ceschi 0 - 0 Burakova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ceschi has won 46.22% of points on their second serve, while Burakova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ceschi, in recent form, has won 54.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Burakova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.62% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ceschi has saved 47.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Burakova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ceschi has won 47.62% of matches played (W/L 20/ 22), with Burakova winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ceschi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 82/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Burakova has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Ceschi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/ 12), where as Burakova has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ceschi has played against opponents with an average rank of 76.36 while Burakova has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ceschi has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Burakova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ceschi has converted 46.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Burakova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
845
Rank
780
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
15
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
43% (86-114)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
48% (10-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gloria Ceschi | Taisiia Burakova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (10/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (24/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (225/230) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (10/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:34 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 63.71 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (627/958) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 52% (325/627) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (153/331) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (53/113) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (433/952) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (10/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Gloria Ceschi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Gabriela Ce
Player
Gloria Ceschi
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Deborah Chiesa
Player
Gloria Ceschi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Gloria Ceschi
94%
(
63 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gloria Ceschi
Player
Moni Potrc
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
12
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Gloria Ceschi
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Gloria Ceschi
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gloria Ceschi
Player
Elena Korokozidi
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gloria Ceschi
Player
Mara Guth
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
12
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Taisiia Burakova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Ceschi Vs Burakova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
